{"id":1011,"date":"2013-01-18T20:31:20","date_gmt":"2013-01-18T19:31:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/?p=1011"},"modified":"2014-05-05T19:06:02","modified_gmt":"2014-05-05T18:06:02","slug":"british-plaintiffs-challenge-judge-in-ocean-view-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/british-plaintiffs-challenge-judge-in-ocean-view-case\/","title":{"rendered":"British plaintiffs challenge judge in Ocean View case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>They are recusing him on the grounds of a connection with the accused<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>More than a hundred people suing to get their money back in the case of a property development which was never built are seeking to get the judge disqualified from hearing the case after finding that his brother was associated with the main defendant, Ricardo Miranda Miret. The group of plaintiffs, most of them British and American, say that Ignacio Coronado Ruz, brother of Madrid judge Jos\u00e9 Emilio Coronado Ruz, was \u201ca shareholder, secretary, and even chairman of the board of Para\u00edso Tropical SA\u201d, a company owned by Ricardo Miranda, who is accused of fraud amounting to more than 12 million euros.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/2013-01-18-OVP-Sur-in-English.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1013\" alt=\"2013-01-18-Sur-in-English\" src=\"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/2013-01-18-Sur-in-English.jpg\" width=\"400\" height=\"567\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/2013-01-18-Sur-in-English.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/2013-01-18-Sur-in-English-211x300.jpg 211w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They are recusing him on the grounds of a connection with the accused More than a hundred people suing to get their money back in the case of a property development which was never built are seeking to get the judge disqualified from hearing the case after finding that his brother was associated with the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1013,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawbird-in-the-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1011"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1016,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1011\/revisions\/1016"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawbird.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}