Tag Archives: Lawbird

April 11th, 2012
Story by RUTH LYTHE | Mail Online

A Money Mail probe has uncovered how thousands of expats have lost their homes and life savings at the hands of rogue financial advisers.

Most victims are pensioners who were conned into gambling on high-risk investments.

Ruth Lythe reports on how those hoping to  find a life in the sun had their world torn apart.

 

Julia Hilling fears losing her Spanish homeThreat: Former actress Julia Hilling fears losing her home in the Spanish sun

Thousands of British expats are on the brink of losing everything after being duped by unscrupulous financial advisers.

The cowboys have persuaded thousands of  our vulnerable pensioners — many in their 80s and 90s — to give up huge stakes of their property in exchange for investments that will never make a penny. 

The schemes are often sold by rogue financial advisers who exploit weak consumer laws on  the Continent by falsely claiming to be bona  fide accountants.

Most of the victims are Britons who retired to Spain or France and wanted to use the cash in their homes to help with soaring living costs.

John Parsons, founder of the Costa del Sol Action Group that is helping some of the victims in Spain, says: ‘The effect of all this worry is enormous. The stress has brought on a lot of serious health issues and they are extremely worried about their futures.

‘These people were not greedy or stupid. They were on fixed pensions and being financially squeezed, so jumped at the possibility of solving that situation.’

The latest crisis follows a Money Mail  investigation in 2008, which exposed how hundreds of British pensioners living on the Costa del Sol had gambled their homes in a risky equity-release scheme run by failed Icelandic bank Landsbanki.

Now we can reveal how thousands more pensioners have fallen for other risky equity-release schemes on the Continent and are being hounded by banks demanding hundreds of thousands of pounds.

 

PREYED ON BY  ROGUE SALESMEN

During the property boom at the start of this century, around 100,000 pensioners left Britain to live out their days in southern France and Spain — attracted by a warmer climate and cheaper way of life.

Many had a small pension, but hundreds of thousands of pounds from the sale of their UK home, which had soared in value over their lifetime.

This money was used to supplement their incomes and buy a new home abroad. But soon after they moved, the cost of living in some areas soared as hundreds of thousands of Britons and Germans bought second homes.

Many pensioners found they needed extra cash, and became easy prey for unregulated financial advisers who had left Britain to tap into the new wealth in these regions.

Local rules meant they were able to act unchecked, selling investments from banks based anywhere in the world.

Sometimes they claimed to be chartered accountants, but were not — many had never even registered with local authorities.

In Spain in particular, these advisers could largely sell whatever they wanted — including types of investments and equity-release schemes outlawed in the UK. These paid handsome commissions that could net advisers a £50,000 payday.

Banks offering equity-release loans included Icelandic bank Landsbanki, Scandinavian banks Nordea and Sydbank, and UK private bank Rothschild. However, Money Mail understands they are not the only banks involved.

The majority of victims were told they could borrow the entire value of their property. The loan would incur interest, typically of up to 6.5 per cent. It meant that after ten years, a €500,000 (£412,667) loan would balloon to €681,240 (£562,251). To offset this, a large chunk — usually around 75 per cent of the loan — would be invested in a fund sold by the adviser.

Pensioners were told returns would be so good that not only would they cover the interest on the equity release, but give the borrowers a little extra to spend.

INVESTMENTS THAT TURNED TOXIC

But the promises made turned out to be very different to the theory. This meant returns did not cover the cost of the interest repayments on the equity release.

As the fund fell in value, it ate into the capital that borrowers needed to repay the debt. Charges for fund managers and commission also reduced the returns further.

Worse was to follow when house prices in Spain fell. They had risen by 44 per cent between 2004 and 2008, when many of the victims had bought their homes. They have since plummeted by around 20 per cent.

Those who had borrowed almost all of their property value were soon in negative equity — where the value of the property value was less than the money owed on it — leaving them unable to sell to clear their debt.

In theory the borrowers were expected to pay off their loan at the end of four years. But because the value of the investments plunged so low, it triggered small print in the equity-release contract that allowed banks to demand repayment early.

In the case of those expats with Landsbanki, the bank collapsed and the investment fund was snatched by company liquidators. Then a further problem struck — the value of the pound plunged against the euro.

Many of the victims were paid pensions in pounds and relied on converting the money into euros every month. The drop meant the value of their pensions fell by a third.

RETIREMENT DREAMS LEFT SHATTERED

Campaigners estimate thousands of British pensioners have lost money through these schemes. Former actress Julia Hilling, 88, fears her home will be swallowed up in repayments to her mortgage from Rothschild Bank.

She was sold the mortgage in 2005 by a Malaga-based British financial adviser. Today, this company is classed as unauthorised by the Spanish authorities. Her property was valued at €300,000 (£249,966) and she took out a loan for €262,000 (£217,827). Around €17,000 (£14,138) was used for living expenses and she put €245,000 (£203,693) in an investment fund. 

Tempted: Julia Hilling, pictured was an actress in the 1940s, says she went for a scheme because she needed to pay billsTempted: Julia Hilling, pictured was an actress in the 1940s, says she went for a scheme because she needed to pay bills

Mrs Hilling, who starred in musicals in the Forties and in revues with Sir Bruce Forsyth at the Windmill Theatre, London, had never invested or even had a mortgage before.

Since 2005, the fund has plunged by around a third and will no longer cover her mortgage. She owes €330,000 (£274,362) and the debt continues to grow. Mrs Hilling says she is unable to cover these costs and fears the bank will take her property when she dies.

‘I needed the money desperately to pay everyday bills while I was out here, as I didn’t want to rely on my family,’ she says.

Rothschild told Money Mail it would not repossess Mrs Hilling’s home. It stressed it had not sold the investment to her and was not demanding repayment nor had it paid commission. It urged her to contact the bank.

Another victim is Eric Mould, 64, who after a career in sales moved to a seaside villa in Puerto Banus, near Malaga, in 2007. He and his wife Mary, 60, sold their four-bedroom detached house in the UK to buy a three-bedroom villa with a swimming pool for €1,188,000 (£990,000).

But five years later they are living in a friend’s flat in the town and battling to pay €2,100 (£1,745) a month in mortgage repayments to Danish bank Nykredit.

Shortly after arriving in Spain, the couple borrowed €1 million against their villa with the bank. They say the British financial adviser who sold them the equity-release mortgage told them it would be a ‘win-win’ situation.

They were told they could free up hundreds of thousands of pounds from the mortgage, and the fund would pay off the loan. They believed the investment they were sold separately through Danish bank Sydbank would leave a little extra to boost their pensions.

To cover the mortgage, the Moulds have rented out their dream home. Their friend is letting them live rent-free in the apartment. The couple fear it is only a matter of time before their home is repossessed. And because property values have dropped, they could lose up to €300,000 (£249,966)

‘This has totally devastated us. It is heart-breaking — we face losing the home we worked for a lifetime to buy,’  says Mr Mould.

Sydbank would not comment on  the case.

Others who took out equity-release schemes with collapsed Icelandic bank Landsbanki have been told it will settle — as long as they pay part of the money owed, in some cases hundreds of thousands of pounds.

One couple, Linda and Frances Barlow, aged 63 and 75, who live in Nice in the south of France, believe the bank’s liquidators will repossess their home by May unless they stump up €1.3 million (£1.08 million).

The liquidators proposed a compromise deal, but it would have required the couple to find €500,000, which they do not have.

The Barlows took only a small proportion of the loan as cash. The rest was invested by the bank, and lost when it collapsed in 2008.

‘We wanted some cash to renovate,’ says Mrs Barlow, a musician from London. ‘We didn’t want to take out a big loan, but the financial adviser told us we were foolish to be sitting on an asset and that we should get an equity release to have an income. Now we are going to lose everything.’

Pensioners fight to keep their homes

Scores of pensioners have launched legal action against the banks and financial advisers who sold them the loans. Solicitor Antonio Flores, of Spanish law firm Law Bird, who is representing some of them, says: ‘Many people are left with huge bills and in fear of losing their homes.’

In February, the European Commission announced plans for an independent ombudsman to deal with mis-selling cases against financial advisers working in the Costa del Sol.

Meanwhile, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has issued official warnings about mortgage schemes advertised as a way of cutting tax bills.

Any expats thinking of signing up to an equity-release scheme in Spain should check the company is registered with the agency in charge of the Spanish stock market, the Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV).

It will also provide a list of companies that are not authorised to operate in Spain and those that have warnings issued against them.

Remember to seek independent legal advice before signing a contract.

If you believe you have been a victim of a fraud involving an equity-release scheme, then register a statement with the police.

Seek independent legal advice about taking action through the courts.

If you wish to complain about the performance of your investments, you should first complain to the equity-release company.

After two months, if you are not happy with the response, take your complaint to the Spanish Investors’ Complaints Office: Oficina de Atención al Inversor, Miguel Ángel 11, 28010 Madrid.

There is also an office at Paseo de Gràcia, 19, 4ª Planta, 08007 Barcelona.

April 11th, 2012
Story by Wendy Williams | The Olive Press

OVER 30 foreign victims of equity release scams gathered outside of Hacienda in Malaga yesterday to protest over an alleged fraud that could see many of them losing their homes.

The mainly British group, led by Euan Armstrong and Ian Sherdley who formed the Equity Release Victims Association, filed denuncias with the Agencia Tributaria against a number of mostly Scandinavian foreign banks.

They now hope Hacienda will intervene after they highlighted Spain is losing a large amount in taxes due to fraudulent schemes where all the money is invested and lost in Luxembourg.

“We already presented all this evidence to the Supreme Court of Spain in Madrid and they chose to ignore it so this way we are bringing their attention to the loss of tax to the Spanish coffers,” said Armstrong, 74.

“It went very well. A good number turned out and each person filed a denuncia with Hacienda.

“We are exposing the situation to the tax office that these banks are taking money from Spain and lodging it in Luxembourg. Spain stands to lose a lot of money.

“I would like to think that Hacienda will now act.”

The group, represented by Antonio Flores from the Marbella based firm Lawbird, demonstrated for over an hour carrying placards which attacked some of the banks they claim have tricked them.

According to the group foreign banks convinced predominately retired foreigners to take out ‘predatory mortgages’ on their homes at a value way above the level of the official appraisal.

Victims were lured in by the false hope they could reduce inheritance tax for their loved ones – who would eventually be liable to pay Spain’s top rate of 34 per cent – and enjoy a salary for life by investing in financial havens such as Luxembourg, supposedly without risk.

But the scam – which could have as many as 600 victims and is estimated at a staggering 250 million euros – has left many of them penniless.

April 9th, 2012
Story by C. Cerbán | Cope

Una treintena de jubilados extranjeros residentes en la Costa del Sol han denunciado hoy ante la Delegación de Hacienda haber sidovíctimas de una estafa inmobiliaria. Estas personas ya denunciaron hace meses ante los tribunales a una decena de entidades bancarias extranjeras por lo que se ha venido a llamar “hipoteca inversa extranjera”.

Según los denunciantes, estos bancos les atemorizaban diciéndoles que en España, cuando alguien muere sin tener hipotecada su vivienda, Hacienda grava a sus herederos con un impuesto de sucesión tan elevado que estos no tienen capacidad económica para pagarlo. Por eso, les ofrecían hipotecar sus inmuebles e invertir el dinero del préstamo en un paraíso fiscal, inversiones que, por otra parte, nunca han recibido. Antonio Flores, del despacho marbellí Lawbird, abogado de este grupo de jubilados, explica que estos bancos “lo que hacían era ofrecerles un préstamo, invertir  y decirles que entre todos iban a ganar bastante dinero”. “Lo que ha pasado es que el dinero se ha invertido en fondos que no han dado lo que tenían que dar y ahora lo que les piden es las casas, que si no pueden pagar el préstamo les entreguen sus viviendas”, dice el letrado.

La mayoría de las viviendas de los afectados se ubican en municipios como Marbella, Torremolinos y Alhaurín de la Torre.

April 9th, 2012
La Información

Decenas de extranjeros jubilados afectados por la conocida como hipoteca inversa han interpuesto una denuncia ante la Delegación de Hacienda de Málaga para que se investigue un supuesto fraude, ya que la Costa del Sol concentra casi la mitad de los 800 casos existentes en España, según el abogado Antonio Flores.

La supuesta trama de estafa y fraude contra la Hacienda Pública habría sido iniciada en 2004 por diez bancos internacionales que desplegaron una “campaña de captación de recursos” en la Costa del Sol, indicó en su día a Efe el letrado del despacho marbellí Lawbird, que atiende al menos a 25 denunciantes por este caso.

Dicha campaña se dirigía a extranjeros con viviendas sin hipoteca con “cierta capacidad económica” y “sin mucha liquidez”, a los que se les ofertaba el producto conocido como “hipoteca inversa”, un préstamo garantizado sobre vivienda habitual para mayores de 65 años o afectados de dependencia, ejecutable sólo tras el fallecimiento del prestatario.

Se trataría de una simulación fraudulenta donde se firman hipotecas en viviendas ya pagadas o sin hipotecar para ceder a los clientes prestamos que son llevados a “paraísos fiscales” con la excusa de que, si fallecían, el coste de su casa sería tan alto a efectos de impuestos de sucesiones que sus hijos nunca podrían heredarlas.

Flores ha explicado que para subsanar este problema, los bancos les ofrecían a estos pensionistas la posibilidad de tomar un préstamo con plazos de amortización “muy largos” sobre la vivienda para reducir su valor para que los descendientes pagaran “muchos menos impuestos” al morir éstos.

Una vez firmados, los afectados “recibían entre el 5 y el 10 por ciento de la cantidad prestada y el resto se invertía en el extranjero” para que con los intereses se pudieran pagar los costes de dicho préstamo y “les quedara un poco de dinero para sobrevivir”, según Flores.

Ahora “han encontrado que tienen préstamos hipotecarios que no pueden pagar” porque pensaban que su banco respaldaba esa inversión y sin embargo ésta “se ha perdido” enLuxemburgo, en Suiza o en las islas del Canal de la Mancha.

Tras averiguar por diferentes medios que este sistema de crear un préstamo hipotecario ficticio podía ser ilegal, estos pensionistas “están asustados”, a juicio del letrado, porque “posiblemente hayan cometido un delito”, y por ello “quieren denunciarlo”.

“Hay documentación suficiente para probar que se les invitaba abiertamente a contratar estos productos”, ha asegurado Flores, quien ha señalado que corresponde a Hacienda investigar “si hay una especie de amnistía fiscal que no es tal”.

Lawbird presentó en noviembre de 2011 una querella, finalmente rechazada, ante laAudiencia Nacional contra diez bancos internacionales entre los que se encuentran Danske Bank, Nordea Bank, Lex Life & Pension, LandsbankiJyske Bank, Finansbanken, Sydbank, N M Rothschild & Sons y Swiss Life.

El presidente de la Asociación de Víctimas de la Hipoteca Inversa Extranjera, Euan Armstrong, un británico de 74 años, adquirió en 2002 una casa en el campo en Alhaurín el Grande (Málaga) por un millón y medio de euros.

Según ha relatado a los periodistas, su banco, Danske Bank, le prestó un millón de euros tras firmar esta hipoteca “para evitar impuestos” del cual una parte se invirtió en Luxemburgo; ahora el banco le reclama su casa, que mantiene alquilada, y él vive en un apartamento en Nueva Andalucía (Marbella).

 

 

April 9th, 2012
Story by NIEVES CASTRO | Diario Sur

Julia Hilling tiene ahora 89 años, sin embargo eso no impidió que un banco británico le colocase un préstamo hace apenas seis años sobre su apartamento de Fuengirola, por importe de 262.000 euros, con devolución prevista para 2016. La operación formaba parte de un acuerdo aparentemente ventajoso. Le prometían una renta vitalicia y que sus herederos iban a quedar exentos del impuesto de sucesiones cuando falleciera. Pero nadie regala duros a cuatro pesetas. A cambio, la anciana tenía que suscribir una hipoteca sobre su vivienda libre de cargas, y autorizar al banco a que invirtiera los fondos obtenidos en productos financieros supuestamente libres de riesgo.

Como ella, otros tantos jubilados asentados en la Costa del Sol han sido víctimas de una presunta estafa orquestada por una docena de entidades extranjeras. Los ancianos, constituidos en la Asociación de Afectados de la Hipoteca Inversa, se harán hoy visibles con una concentración de protesta a las puertas de la Delegación de Hacienda de Málaga. Está previsto que alrededor de una treintena de jubilados británicos tomen parte en esta movilización, tras la que presentarán una denuncia formal en la institución contra las entidades bancarias.

Escándalo

«Con esta medida se pretende llamar la atención de las autoridades sobre un asunto que en muchos países europeos ya se considera un escándalo de grandes proporciones, lo que contrasta con la absoluta apatía judicial y desidia de los tribunales españoles, que hace unos meses rechazaron investigar el asunto», denuncian desde el despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en Marbella, que representa los intereses de una mayoría de afectados. El bufete pone de ejemplo lo sucedido en Dinamarca, donde, según concretan, se ha creado una gran alarma social tras la cobertura informativa realizada por el rotativo Jyllands Posten -conocido entre otras cosas por haber publicado las caricaturas del profeta Mahoma-. «El diario publicó que un elevado número de bancos daneses habrían participado en una trama de fraude fiscal en España, relacionado con el impuesto de sucesiones, y a la vez denunció la dramática situación económica a la que habían llevado a cientos de jubilados», subrayan desde Lawbird. De hecho, añaden que la situación a la que se han visto abocados estos ancianos es dramática, hasta el punto de que muchos están a punto de ser desahuciados de sus casas, después de que los bancos hayan perdido más de la mitad del capital en inversiones y hayan empezado a exigir el pago de las cuotas.

February 6th, 2012
Story by ROB SMYTH | Burton Mail

A subpoena is set to be served for Colin Thomas, of Town Hill, to appear in Madrid as a class action lawsuit against Spanish developer Ricardo Miranda Miret continues to rumble on in an effort to recover money on behalf of dozens of Ocean View Properties (OVP) victims.

The criminal claim for fraud and misappropriation of funds was lodged in a Madrid court last year and included Mr Thomas and other directors of his firm.

The prosecuting lawyer is seeking more than £6.5 million in damages for 70 claimants.

The firm took deposits worth around £80,000 each from British investors, but much of the cash disappeared as the homes failed to materialise, it is alleged.

Antonio Flores, the Spanish prosecuting lawyer from Marbella-based firm Lawbird, said: “We have requested that Colin Thomas specifically is summoned and quizzed.

“I don’t believe OVP knew anything about what was going on but they will be forced to talk in court.

“This was a scam of huge proportions. It has the potential of becoming one of the biggest property scams, as none of the developments will be built.” Mr Thomas’s company was behind a number of successful enterprises but ran into difficulties when it became involved as an agent for Spanish developer Ricardo Miranda Miret.

More than a thousand British investors who paid £45 million for off-plan overseas property developments have lost their money after the firm was formally dissolved in 2009 with the appointment of liquidators Grant Thornton.

The Madrid court claims are linked with developments that never materialised at the Estepona Country Club on the Costa del Sol and Punta Perla, in the Dominican Republic.

This comes after the Mail revealed that The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and Staffordshire Police would take ‘no further action’ following the collapse of OVP.

Last year, the Mail also revealed that 50- year-old Mr Thomas was banned from being a company director for nine years after an Insolvency Service investigation revealed that he had pocketed almost £14 million despite the firm being insolvent.

The findings also showed that his firm took £23 million from customers for a Spanish development that it did not own, did not have a building licence for and never undertook any construction work on.

Despite efforts by the Mail, neither Mr Thomas nor his advisors were unavailable for comment.

February 1st, 2012
The Olive Press

THE AUDIENCIA NACIONAL WILL NOT BE INVESTIGATING THE SCAM THAT LEFT SCORES OF EXPATS AT RISK OF LOSING THEIR HOMES

The Audiencia Nacional insists there is not enough evidence to merit launching a criminal investigation despite the group of 20 foreign residents filing over 200 pages of documents against several Scandinavian banks.

“This is a clear case of judicial apathy by the Court which, after probably not reading the claim, considered it nevertheless irrelevant in what is a steadily worsening record of protecting rights of consumers,” said Antonio Flores from Marbella law firm Lawbird who is representing the Malaga victims.

But offering a ray of hope to the hundreds of expats affected, the Danish government on the other hand has now decided to open an investigation into the scam.

“It does not sound very good if a Danish bank is involved in such a concept. It will be included in our priorities” insisted Johnny Hansen Schaadt, director of The Danish Tax Office Special Department of Economic Crime.

January 26th, 2012
Story by PRINCESA SÁNCHEZ | La Opinión de Málaga

Los presuntos estafados, en los juzgados marbellíes. P.S.

Más de 30 británicos se concentraron ayer en los juzgados de instrucción de Marbella, ubicados en la avenida Mayorazgo. Portaban carteles en los que preguntaban dónde está su dinero y dónde están sus muebles, en señal de protesta. Se declaran afectados por un engaño masivo que les hizo perder un total de 500.000 euros, un dinero que estaba destinado para comprar unos enseres para sus viviendas que nunca llegaron a tener.

Ayer, acudieron a ratificar su querella en contra de la empresa MacAnthony Realty Internacional, la entidad a la que acusan de estafa y apropiación indebida; una empresa con sede en Marbella pero que desapareció «de forma irregular», explicó el abogado que representa a 35 presuntos estafados, Luis González.

«No han llevado a cabo ninguna liquidación ordinaria ni concurso ni ninguna forma normal de desaparición», indicó el letrado. Para González, se trataba de un complejo societario «tendente a engañar para quedarse con el dinero». La empresa del principal acusado, Darragh MacAnthony, estaba participada por una sociedad radicada en Perú y cuyo administrador es una persona de 90 años con domicilio en este país sudamericano, añadió.

Depurar responsabilidades. Las supuestas víctimas presentaron ayer sus pasaportes y ratificaron su querella en el juzgado de instrucción número 4 de Marbella. La mayoría proceden de Inglaterra e Irlanda y pagaron entre 10.000 y 40.000 euros cada uno por sus muebles, aunque el despacho marbellí que lleva el caso, Lawbird, calcula que las cantidades estafadas son millonarias y los afectados son muchos más de los que representan.

«Las operaciones se han hecho en masa, hablamos de cientos de afectados que han dado el dinero por perdido. Son cantidades importantes pero quizá no lo suficiente para que tengan que molestarse y venir a España a plantear una querella», argumentó.

La empresa de MacAnthony se presentaba como una entidad intermediaria que les presentaba los muebles por catálogo y que, supuestamente, los encargaba a los fabricantes, ubicados en países como Turquía. Esta característica se ofrecía como un ahorro para los compradores que tenían comprado sus inmuebles en otros países como Marruecos, Chipre, Bulgaria o Tailandia.

El principal acusado, Darragh MacAnthony, niega su responsabilidad en el asunto, tal como indicó el bufete que representa a los supuestos estafados. En la actualidad, MacAnthony es el propietario de un club de fútbol de la primera división inglesa.

«No sabemos exactamente dónde se encuentra. Sabemos que tiene domicilio en España y concretamente en Marbella», explicó González. «Vamos a ver las diligencias de averiguación que se realizan por los juzgados y policía para ver si lo pueden localizar. Queremos que acredite lo que tenga que acreditar», advirtió.

El objetivo de los querellantes es recuperar el dinero que desembolsaron pero, sobre todo, quieren que se depuren responsabilidades. «Queremos que se aclare todo», manifestaron ayer.

 

January 16th, 2012
Story by Agencia EFE | La Voz Digital

Marbella (Málaga), 16 ene (EFE).- La Audiencia Nacional (AN) ha resuelto no admitir a trámite la querella interpuesta contra bancos internacionales por la Asociación de Víctimas de la Hipoteca Inversa Extranjera por una presunta estafa.

Esta supuesta trama se originó en el año 2004 a través de una red de agentes financieros, según han declarado a Efe el abogado Antonio Flores, del despacho querellante Lawbird Legal Services, ubicado en Marbella.
El objetivo era desplegar una campaña de captación de recursos en la Costa del Sol, principalmente a pensionistas extranjeros con viviendas sin hipoteca a los que se ofrecía un producto conocido como “hipoteca inversa”.
El presunto delito consistía en una simulación donde se “trababan hipotecas” en viviendas ya pagadas o sin hipotecar para ceder préstamos a los clientes que eran llevados a paraísos fiscales, principalmente Luxemburgo, con el objetivo de evadir el impuesto de sucesiones y el de patrimonio, según Flores.
El dinero de las víctimas se destinaba a inversiones en mercados financieros que han derivado en bonos japoneses, coronas checas, francos suizos, en monedas, en divisas y bonos de otros bancos.
El auto emitido por el juzgado de instrucción número cuatro de la Audiencia Nacional, al que ha tenido acceso Efe, dicta la inadmisión de la querella al “no concurrir los requisitos legales necesarios para considerar competente al juzgado Central de Instrucción”.
Por otro lado, el escrito recoge que el rechazo a trámite se debe a la “más que dudosa existencia de datos suficientes como para proceder a la incoación de un proceso penal” en virtud de la información aportada en la querella.
Según la Audiencia Nacional, no queda probada la existencia de una conexión entre los delitos planteados, otro motivo por el cual no es competencia de la Audiencia Nacional instruir el caso.
La querella fue interpuesta el pasado mes de noviembre contra las entidades bancarias europeas Danske Bank, Nordea Bank, N M Rothschild & Sons, Lex Life 6 Pension, Landsbanki, Jyske Bank, Finansbanken, Nykredit, Sydbank y Swiss Life.
January 15th, 2012
El Mundo
  • La Audiencia Nacional argumenta que faltan datos para iniciar un proceso
  • Los denunciantes afirman que les engañaron para hipotecar sus viviendas

El juzgado central de Instrucción número 4 de la Audiencia Nacional ha rechazado investigar la presunta estafa que sufrieron una veintena de jubilados extranjeros por parte de diversas entidades bancarias, en su mayoría escandinavas.

En noviembre, presentaron una querella contra nueve bancos extranjeros por estafa, publicidad engañosa, defraudación a la Hacienda Pública, así como falsedad en documento público por lo que han denominado “hipoteca inversa extranjera”.

Según señalan los denunciantes, agentes financieros los atemorizaban diciendo que en España, si alguien muere sin tener una hipoteca sobre su vivienda, el fisco grava de tal manera la sucesión que los herederos nunca podrían abonar los impuestos correspondientes. Entonces les ofrecieron hipotecar su vivienda, enviar ese dinero a un paraíso fiscal, sobre todo Luxemburgo, e invertirlo. Pero esas inversiones salieron mal y ahora estas personas luchan para no quedarse sin sus propiedades.

La Audiencia Nacional ha dictado un “auto de inadmisión de la querella interpuesta, al no concurrir los requisitos legales necesarios para considerar competente al juzgado Central de Instrucción para instruir el objeto de la misma”.

Además, argumenta que el tribunal no tiene competencia territorial y que faltan datos suficientes en la querella para inciar un procedimiento penal, algo que critica el despacho Lawbird, con sede en Marbella, que representa a un grupo de denunciantes.

“Se aprecia una absoluta apatía judicial por parte de este tribunal que ha considerado esta denuncia como carente de relevancia”, señalan desde el bufete, desde donde indican que “esta clamorosa pereza y ligereza contrasta con la presurosa reacción del Gobierno danés, que ha anunciado que se investigarán las maniobras por las cuales el importe de los préstamos se colocaban en paraísos fiscales, dentro del tráfico habitual en el sector financiero”.