logo


Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Lawbird’

Why Spain’s Costa del Crime is now the worst place to go on the run

May 18th, 2013

Once a land of Ferraris, cocaine and women, it was the flashy destination of choice for the most notorious fugitives of Britain’s underworld. Now, as the arrest of Andrew Moran shows, Spain’s “Costa del Crime” is the worst place to go on the run, reports Colin Freeman.

Since he last gained fame as a brief item in the “Crimewatch” slot of his local television news, a lot has changed for Manchester armed robber Jason Coghlan.

Having broken out of the dock during a court appearance in 1999, he spent a fortnight as one of the North West’s most wanted men before being re-arrested and sentenced to 12 years in Britain’s highest security jails.

Today, though, the man the police warned the public not to approach comes across as very approachable, having turned his back on crime in favour of a new venture in sunny Marbella.

This time he is on the right side of the law – just – acting as a legal “Mr Fixit” to the British criminal fraternity, who complain that a decent Spanish lawyer is as hard to find as a decent Spanish plumber.

“A lot of lawyers out here aren’t good at acting for foreign criminals, and when Brits get arrested they need someone like me to guide them to a decent one,” said Mr Coghlan, 43, whose younger brother, Arran, is nicknamed the “Teflon Don” back in Manchester after three separate attempts to prosecute him for different murders failed.

 

Jason Coghlan

“I make sure they’re represented properly and handle the translation issues, but I can also talk the criminal’s language, as it were, because of my background,” Mr Coghlan added.

One potential client for Mr Coghlan now is fellow Mancunian Andrew Moran, 31, who last week became the star of his very own mini-gangster movie when Spanish police released a video of his arrest at the poolside of his villa in Calpe, near Benidorm.

The footage, which received widespread media coverage, showed police creeping up on Mr Moran as he sunbathed, pouncing on him as he vaulted over a garden wall to escape. That it looked like a scene from the Costa-based crime flick Sexy Beast, in which Ray Winstone’s retired villain whiles away life by the pool, was no coincidence. Spanish police, who allegedly discovered two pistols at Moran’s villa, knew that if they grabbed him in his trunks, he was unlikely to be armed.

In the back yard of Moran’s empty villa this weekend, a bottle of Factor 20 suncream was the only remaining sign of his life in the run, which began four years ago with a previous vault from the dock of Burnley Crown Court, when he was on trial for a mail van hold-up. Spanish judges are now debating whether to extradite him to Britain, or try him in Spain, where he faces separate charges of cannabis dealing and ramming two police cars while evading a previous arrest attempt last year.

Yet while Moran’s arrest was hailed as a triumph by British police, who nowadays work much more closely with their Spanish counterparts, it also showed that the “Costa del Crime” is still popular with Britons facing accusations of villainy.

Moran was on a list of no less than 65 “most wanted” issued in the past six years by Operation Captura, the Spanish arm of Britain’s Crimestoppers scheme, which targets suspects thought to be hiding in Spain by distributing leaflets and beer mats with hotline numbers to expat bars. Of that 65, all but 15 have now been arrested. And at the risk of doing himself out of future clients, Mr Coghlan says that other fugitives planning on coming here should think again.

“Quote me on this – Spain is singularly the worst place to go on the run,” he said.

Police capture Andrew Moran in Calpe.

“In the 1970s it was okay because there was no extradition treaty. But nowadays there is lots of police attention, both British and Spanish. You might as well hide in Norfolk. Spain is not an imaginative choice at all, but then again, many villains do not have much imagination.”

It is a far cry from the old days, which Mr Coghlan himself caught the tail end of in the 1990s, when he would regularly head out to Marbella to spend the proceeds of his crimes, blowing tens of thousands of pounds in just a few weeks.

“Back then I felt like a king, and it felt safe to spend money there,” he said. “There was a place where you could hire Ferraris for £600 a day, and the women were experts at parting you from your cash. I loved the birds, and I’d buy them whatever it took – jewellery, clothes whatever – just so we’d look good when out at night.

“But the Spanish police back then were a different breed, and you could still offer them money to get out of serious situations. Act all flash these days, and you’ll soon get into trouble.”

Certainly, Mr Moran appears to have kept a low profile, having had a distinctive mole removed via plastic surgery and swapping his skinhead look for a short-back-and sides and wispy moustache. He also seems to have avoided the expat bars in Calpe’s “English Square” where, apart from a local character named “Pikey Pete”, no-one remembers seeing any villainous types for years.

“Nowadays, those kind of people stay in villas out in the countryside and keep themselves to themselves,” said one drinker, who nonetheless asked not to named.

Making life harder these days is increased airport security, the introduction of the pan-European arrest warrant in 2004, and occasional swoops by Spanish police, who will sometimes do random ID checks in bars frequented by British villains.

Yet many fugitives do still take their chances here, as is evident from a flick through the outstanding Captura wanted list, where the mugshots of Glasgow hardmen, Geordie gangsters and East End enforcers show the modern British underworld at all levels.

At the upper end are current fugitives like David Andrews, 66, accused of running a major cocaine trafficking gang, and Derek “Decco” Ferguson, wanted over a Strathclyde pub carpark shooting in 2007. Further down, meanwhile, are men like alleged heroin dealer Scott Coleman, who, with a distinctive pair of lips tattooed on his buttocks, has presumably had to be more cautious with the ladies than Mr Coghlan was.

So why do they still come? “It’s partly because there is a well established British community there that they can assimilate into very easily,” said Dave Allen, head of the fugitives unit at the Serious and Organised Crime Agency.

“Parts of Spain are basically like south London with sunshine. Having said that, we’ve changed our policing methods a lot in the last 30 years, and nowadays, criminals who move abroad are never off our radar.”

The other attraction is Spain’s prime location in the drug trade, which is now booming more than ever. Cocaine and marijuana is easily trafficked in from North Africa, from where it can then be sold retail on the Costa club scene, or shipped wholesale to Britain. According to some estimates, as many as 30 or 40 British criminal gangs now operate in southern Spain, alongside Dutch, Eastern European and Irish gangs, the latter fleeing recent crackdowns in their Dublin strongholds.

True, increased transport hub security in the post 9/11 era makes airports and ports harder for fugitives. But many use so-called “FOG” passports – or “fraudulently obtained genuine” passports – whereby a criminal will bribe someone for their personal documents and then use them to obtain a legally valid passport.

Once out in Spain, criminals can also usually rely on networks of contacts to help them, said Mr Allen – assuming they are not “too hot to handle”.

But while a large criminal fraternity can help provide a support network, it can also be a problem. Fellow villains are far more likely to recognise fugitives – and give their game away – than ordinary members of the public are.

“The police always call it ‘intelligence’ to make themselves sound intelligent, but when they arrest someone it’s usually just some other villain has informed on them,” said Mr Coghlan.

Which is where his new Marbella-based firm, Jacog Law, comes in.

Specialising in “Spanish to English Criminal Legal Services”, it has gained 28 clients since starting 16 months ago, including a Briton accused of smuggling a tonne of hashish, and a suspected IRA hitman convicted of murdering Daniel Smith, himself a suspected gangster, in a bar near Marbella in 2010. And while Mr Coghlan does not claim to be a lawyer, he does bring considerable practical experience of criminal legal systems, both in Britain and in Spain.

Originally from Stockport, he fell into crime when he was young, being booted out of the Commandos for assault and theft and then becoming involved in car-ringing and robbery. His brother Arran, meanwhile, has been accused three times of the murders of northern gangland figures and also arrested over a large-scale cocaine smuggling plot. He has never been convicted of any of the offences, however, and insists he is a legitimate businessman facing a police vendetta.

After his initial arrest for the 1999 post office robbery, Jason Coghlan escaped from Trafford Magistrates Court, where, having told guards he needed crutches for a leg injury, he threw the crutches away and leaped over the dock. He was then caught in Blackpool a fortnight later, and having been classified as a Category Double AA high-risk prisoner, served his time in maximum security jails like Whitemoor, where he met Britain’s topmost gangsters. Among them was the Brinks Mat bullion handler and road rage killer Kenneth Noye, who himself was arrested in Spain in 1998 after two years on the run.

“I did ask him once why he’d gone to the south of Spain,” said Mr Coghlan. “He said that for people of his generation, it was the only place they really knew.”

Having decided to reform, Mr Coghlan become a jail-house lawyer while inside, advising other prisoners on legal cases and appeals. He got the idea for his current venture, though, after subsequently being thrown in jail in Spain, where he went after his release in Britain to pursue an alleged time-share fraudster who owed his mother money. The man complained to the police, who then arrested Mr Coghlan and held him on remand for 11 months. Worse still, he claims, a lawyer he paid €10,000 to only visited him once.

“It is hard to describe how bad the legal service is out here,” he said.

“While I was in prison I also heard dozens of other complaints about the inefficiencies of lawyers out here, and having learned the hard way, I now want to change that.”

To that end, his firm refers work to a number of favoured legal firms, in return for a percentage of any fees they then charge. Unlike some Spanish legal firms, he says, they will challenge weak police cases rather than simply plea bargaining.

“It is fair to say that a lot of Spanish lawyers take a rather laid back approach,” agreed Antonio Flores, a leading lawyer at Lawbird Legal Services in Marbella, which has had referrals from Mr Coghlan.

True, Mr Coghlan freely admits that his own reputation helps to ensure that nobody trifles with his clients. But he adds: “There is nothing legally wrong with what we do, even if the authorities don’t like it. And I’m not pretending to be a lawyer, I’m just a good case administrator.”

Ironically for a man who now claims to have gone straight, the success of his future venture will, of course, depend on the Costa del Crime continuing to attract villains. As things stand, though, that seems likely – even if they do look over their shoulder rather more often while sitting by the pool.

In the Media ,

Owner of leisure complex Laguna Village ordered to pay back deposit to British investor

April 25th, 2013


2013-04-25-Lawbird-Owner-of-leisure-complex-Laguna-Village-to-Pay-Investor2013-04-25-Lawbird-Owner-of-leisure-complex-Laguna-Village-to-Pay-InvestorThe Malaga Appeal Court has ordered the property developing company Playa Padrón Estepona S.L., managed by German businessman Jürgen Sauer, owner of the Estepona leisure complex Laguna Village and co-founder of the Kempinski hotel, to pay just under 500,000 euros to a British investor.

The investor, represented in court by lawyer Luis Fernando Gonzalez Ordoñez, from Marbella law firm Lawbird Legal Services, had exchanged contracts in 2006 for the acquisition of several units in the complex. However the purchase was never completed because these units were rented out to third parties even though the seller had agreed, contractually, that they were to be sold “free from occupants”.

The investor had paid 185,000 euros to the developer and agreed that, in the event that he was unable to conclude the transaction he would forfeit the deposit but, if the developer was unable to sell under the terms and conditions agreed, it would return twice the deposit, plus interest.

The initial case against the developers ruled in their favour, citing the relevant clause as a clerical error. Following the successful appeal the company managing Laguna Village is obliged to pay 365,000 euros to the investor plus accrued interest since 2006 and legal costs.

In the Media , ,

Condenan al cofundador del hotel Kempinski a abonar medio millón de euros

April 18th, 2013

La Audiencia Provincial de Málaga ha condenado a la mercantil Playa Padrón Estepona S.L., promotora del complejo de ocio radicado en Estepona conocido como ‘Laguna Village’, fundada y administrada por el empresario alemán Jürgen Sauer, a abonar cerca de medio millón de euros a un inversor británico.

Dicho inversor, representado en juicio por el letrado de Lawbird Luis Fernando González Ordóñez, había firmado un contrato de arras para la adquisición de varias unidades en el complejo en el año 2006, en régimen de concesión administrativa, y no pudo escriturarlas al estar éstas alquiladas, dándose la circunstancia de que las mismas se habían vendido “libres de inquilinos u ocupantes”.

En total, el inversor abonó 185.000 euros a la promotora, y acordaron que de no proceder con la escritura por causa imputable a la compradora, esta perdería el depósito, pero que de ser la vendedora la que no pudiera vender, vendría obligada a devolver el doble de lo abonado —según se prevé para los contratos de arras penitenciales—, más los intereses desde el año 2006 y las costas procesales causadas.

El Juzgado de Primera Instancia 2 de Estepona dio inicialmente la razón a la mercantil Playa Padrón Estepona S.L., no estimando la petición del inversor británico, al aceptar como buena, entre otras, la alegación de que la cláusula de devolución del duplo de lo abonado se insertó en el contrato por culpa de un error administrativo. Sin embargo, la Audiencia Provincial en reciente sentencia estima el recurso formulado por la representación legal del inversor y revoca íntegramente la sentencia,condenando a la mercantil concesionaria de complejo ‘Laguna Village’ a abonar 365.000 euros, con sus intereses y costas.

Se da la circunstancia de que el empresario Jürgen Sauer, administrador de Laguna Village, cofundador del Hotel Kempinski de Estepona y propietario de la inmobiliaria Sauer, fue detenido en el año 2008 por un presunto delito de blanqueo de capitales en el marco de la Operación Hidalgo por la Juez María Jesús del Pilar Márquez, quinta instructora de la causa que inició el Juez Francisco de Urquía.

El letrado Luis González ha señalado que “la mercantil no contesta a los requerimientos del despacho para proceder al abono del importe de la condena, por lo que se procederá a ejecutar la sentencia, embargando, si fuera necesario, los alquileres que regularmente abonan los inquilinos de los locales del complejo Laguna Village”.

In the Media ,

Spanish tax office will not accept equity release to mitigate taxes

March 22nd, 2013

Lawbird-Spanish-tax-office-will-not-accept-Equity-Release

 

A Marbella law firm has denounced around ten banks for fraud

Spanish “Hacienda” has recently confirmed that the so-called Equity release on Spanish property is not valid for tax mitigation purposes. According to an official answer to an enquiry submitted by Lawbird Legal Services representing 100 of approximately 1,000 victims, mostly British, attempting to mitigate wealth and inheritance taxes registering a charge against the property is tax fraud.  

This matter was denounced a year ago at the Audiencia Nacional as fraud, fraudulent publicity and tax evasion but the Magistrate Fernando Andreu dismissed the case on grounds that he deemed the allegations to not be of a serious nature and the facts were not proven conclusively. Civil proceedings have been filed and rulings are soon expected.  

According to Antonio Flores of Lawbird, “the Tax Office’s response represents a boost to the aspirations of the victims in relation to demonstrating that, indeed, they were victims of a scam and not accomplices to an alleged fraud, as has been insinuated”.  

Following the dismissal of the case by the National Audience back in April 2012 and further to a “denuncia” filed at the Malaga offices of the Spanish Tax Office, Lawbird indicated that it was this body who should investigate if such a “tax amnesty”, now deemed fraud, did actually exist.  

Tax fraud

Hacienda has now come back stating that the approximately 600 mortgage loans sold to foreign pensioners with a Spanish property, under the pretext that they would allow them to – legally- mitigate wealth tax during the life of the subscriber, and inheritance taxes following their demise, cannot benefit from any reduction in such taxes. In fact, the Tax Office states that attempting to reduce the value of the home would constitute tax fraud and a criminal offence where the defrauded sum exceeds €120,000 per tax year.  

Lawbird deems that “the borrowers are victims because top banks confirmed the legality of the product, assisted by top-notch Madrid lawyers who now, following the repercussions of the case, are distancing themselves from their former clients.”  

Banks

The banks allegedly involved are Nordea Bank Luxemburg, Danske Bank Luxemburg, Landsbanki, Jyske Bank,Rothschild, Sydbank and Nykredit who sold either directly, or through unregulated Costa financial offices, the financial packages. Most of the pseudo-IFAs have now disappeared.  

According to the victims, the strategy was to scare them with unbearable tax consequences should they not do anything with their unencumbered properties. Several banks, most of them from Scandinavian countries with private banking offices in Luxembourg, made their clients believe that that in Spain, if someone is to die without having a mortgage on their properties, the Tax Office would tax the inheritors so heavily that they would not be able to ever pay those taxes.  

They offered mortgage loans to reduce the value of their properties and advised that the loan capital should be sent to opaque tax havens, in some cases, with a view to have it invested on behalf of the pensioner. However, as a result of poor investment decisions by these banks the invested capital lost substantially and now, the victims are fighting to save their homes.  

This alleged financial plot started in 2004 and finished in 2008. Flores calculated that in Spain, over 500 couples could be affected, most of them pensioners. The total sum of funds taken out to Luxembourg could reach 250 million euros, according to the lawyer. The banks told their clients that this sum would be “tax free” if it was inherited in a tax haven, or without the Spanish Hacienda’s knowledge. The alleged fraud to the Tax Office could reach, on average, 20 per cent of the total sums, approximately 50 million euros in total.  

Lawbird is particularly worried that pensioners with very limited income, some of whom were over 85 years of age, decided to rush into speculative investments with their properties.

Spanish tax office will not accept equity release to mitigate taxes

 

In the Media , ,

Recusan al juez instructor de una macroestafa inmobiliaria que tuvo lugar en Estepona

January 18th, 2013

El hermano del magistrado estaba vinculado al principal implicado en el fraude

Audiencia Provincial Madrid

El titular del Juzgado de Instrucción Número 16 de Madrid, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, ha sido recusado por un centenar de afectados por una macroestafa inmobiliaria en Estepona. El despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en Marbella, le demandan que abandone el caso, al conocer que el hermano de dicho instructor, Ignacio Coronado Ruz, ha sido “accionista, secretario e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical S.A.”. Y es que, resulta sorprendente que el juez instructor no supiera la vinculación de su hermano con los hechos denunciados que comenzó a investigar hace dos años.

La citada mercantil es propiedad de uno de los principales imputados en el caso, Ricardo Miranda, acusado de haberse apoderado de más de 12 millones de euros pagados por los estafados en concepto de depósitos para sus futuras viviendas. Las promociones, que iban a estar ubicadas en Estepona y en República Dominicana, nunca se llevaron a cabo.

Además, el hermano del instructor ha sido también representante de la mercantil inversiones CCF S.A., antiguo cotitular de unos terrenos propiedad de sociedades de Miranda en República Dominicana. Y es que, es sabido que no solo hay afectados por el fraude en Estepona, sino tabién en el citado país caribeño.

A su vez, la sociedad CCF S.A. era copropietaria de los terrenos dominicanos junto a CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios S.A., cuyos dueños son los conocidos empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor, ambos juzgados recientemente en el juicio oral del Caso Malaya.

De este modo, el bufete Lawbird solicita además la ampliación de la querella inicial, pidiendo que sean imputados junto a Miranda los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor, además del hermano del magistrado, ya que todos ellos “cobraron de las empresas de Miranda por la venta de sus acciones y transmisión de los terrenos de República Dominicana”. En concreto, Ignacio Coronado se embolsó 100.000 euros a título personal.

Asimismo, cabe recordar que la inmobiliaria Ocean View y Sun Golf Desarrollos Inmobiliarios, cuyo dueño es Ricardo Miranda, promocionaron y vendieron a una gran parte de los querellantes – británicos, irlandeses y norteamericanos, que habían elegido Estepona como un lugar seguro para sus inversiones y también como segunda residencia – viviendas en la localidad en la promoción denominada Estepona & Country Club, que iba a construirse en Arrroyo Vaquero.

Pero lo cierto es que la promotora jamás fue propietaria de dicho terreno, de hecho, ni si quiera el suelo es apto para edificar. Además, la licencia de obra nunca fue solciitada. Tan solo se pidió permiso para la caseta de ventas que, pero fue denegado por el Ayuntamiento de Estepona.

De este modo, “tanto Ocean View como la promotora y Ricardo Miranda”, estando al tanto de lo anterior, se enriquecieron con las ventas sobre plano, desviaron los depósitos a sus empresas en República Dominicana para financiar la compra de terrenos, y continuaron allí el irregular negocio inmobiliario. Por último, los letrados han destacado que para evitar el alcance de semejante engaño, los contratos solo fueron firmados por los compradores, mientras que la promotora se abstuvo de ello. 

In the Media , , , ,

Más de un centenar de británicos recusan al juez que investiga una macroestafa inmobiliaria en la Costa del Sol

January 17th, 2013

Más de un centenar de afectados por una macroestafa inmobiliaria en la Costa del Sol, en su mayoría de nacionalidad británica y norteamericana, han recusado al titular del Juzgado de Instrucción Número 16 de Madrid, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, tras detectar que su hermano, Ignacio Coronado Ruz, “aparece vinculado societariamente al principal implicado en el fraude, Ricardo Miranda Miret”.

El despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en la localidad malagueña de Marbella y representante de los afectados por dicha estafa, se ha hecho cargo de la presentación de la correspondiente recusación.

En el escrito dirigido al juez Coronado Ruz para que abandone el caso, los abogados Antonio Flores Vila y Luis Fernando González Ordóñez han hecho constar que el hermano del instructor ha sido “accionista, secretario, e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical SA”, según ha informado el despacho de abogados a través de un comunicado.

Se trata de la mercantil propiedad del principal imputado, Ricardo Miranda, acusado de haberse apoderado de más de 12 millones de euros pagados por los estafados en concepto de depósitos para sus futuras viviendas. Las promociones, que iban a estar ubicadas en una parcela de Estepona y República Dominicana, nunca se llevaron a cabo.

Así, Ignacio Coronado Ruz ha sido también representante de la mercantil Inversiones CCF S.A. –antiguo cotitular de unos terrenos propiedad de sociedades de Miranda en República Dominicana–, según el comunicado.

Tal y como ya se conoció públicamente al presentarse la querella por esta estafa inmobiliaria, en febrero de 2011, no sólo hay afectados por el fraude en Estepona, sino también en el citado país caribeño, según el citado comunicado.

La sociedad CCF S.A., a la que ha estado vinculado el hermano del juez instructor, era copropietaria de los terrenos dominicanos junto a CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios S.A. cuyos dueños son los conocidos empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor.

Según ha informado el despacho de abogados Lawbird, ambos han sido juzgados recientemente en el juicio oral por el Caso ‘Malaya’ y se enfrentan a abultadas penas de cárcel por diversos delitos, principalmente cohecho.

Así, el bufete Lawbird ha solicitado no sólo la recusación del juez Coronado, sino también la ampliación de la querella inicial. Pretenden que también sean imputados junto a Miranda los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor, además del hermano del magistrado de Plaza Castilla.

“Todos ellos, incluido Ignacio Coronado, cobraron de las empresas de Miranda por la venta de sus acciones y transmisión de los terrenos de República Dominicana”, ha expresado el comunicado. En concreto, la ampliación de la querella recoge que el hermano del titular del Juzgado de Instrucción 16 de Madrid habría cobrado 100.000 euros a título personal, aproximadamente.

En opinión de los letrados querellantes “es impensable entender que el juez instructor no supiera la vinculación de su hermano con los hechos denunciados que comenzó a investigar”. Así pues, afirman que Coronado “ha estado instruyendo casi dos años como si lo ignorara”.

También, lamentan que el juez ahora recusado no haya tomado medida cautelar alguna, desde que comenzó a instruir dicha querella, y no descartan “acciones judiciales directas” derivadas de los hechos de la recusación, “teniendo en cuenta en todo este caso la mejor atención a nuestros clientes que depositaron su confianza en la justicia penal española, y a fin de evitar que situaciones como la presente vuelvan a plantearse a nadie que acuda a pedir justicia en España”.

Los damnificados, en su mayoría de nacionalidad británica, pero también irlandeses y norteamericanos, habían elegido Estepona como un lugar seguro para sus inversiones y también como segunda residencia.

Cabe recordar que la inmobiliaria Ocean View y Sun Golf Desarrollos Inmobiliarios, cuyo dueño es Ricardo Miranda, promocionaron y vendieron a gran parte de los querellantes viviendas en Estepona en la promoción denominada Estepona & Country Club. Se iba a construir en el paraje de Arroyo Vaquero.

Además, Lawbird ha expresado que la promotora jamás ha sido propietaria del citado terreno y el suelo no es apto siquiera para edificar, nunca lo fue. Nunca fue solicitada la licencia de obra para construir, ante el Ayuntamiento de Estepona (Málaga). A lo máximo que llegó el promotor fue a pedir un permiso para la caseta de ventas que, incluso, fue denegado por el Consistorio malagueño.

Por último, Lawbird ha denunciado que “tanto Ocean View como la promotora y Ricardo Miranda sabían todo lo anterior y, sin embargo se enriquecieron con las ventas sobre plano”, desviando los depósitos a sus empresas en República Dominicana para financiar la compra de terrenos, y así continuar allí el irregular negocio inmobiliario objeto también de la querella. Los letrados Flores y González Ordóñez destacan que “para evitar el alcance de semejante engaño, la promotora nunca firmó los contratos que sí firmaron los compradores”.

Also in:

 

In the Media , , , , ,

Recusan al juez que investiga una estafa por vínculos familiares con la sociedad sospechosa

January 17th, 2013

Más de un centenar de afectados por una estafa inmobiliaria en la Costa del Sol, la mayoría de nacionalidad británica y norteamericana, han recusado al titular del Juzgado de Instrucción Número 16 de Madrid, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, tras detectar que su hermano, Ignacio Coronado Ruz, “aparece vinculado societariamente al principal implicado en el fraude, Ricardo Miranda Miret”.

El despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en Marbella y representante de los afectados, se ha hecho cargo de presentar la correspondiente recusación.

En el escrito dirigido al juez Coronado Ruz para que abandone el caso, los abogados Antonio Flores Vila y Luis Fernando González Ordóñez han hecho constar que el hermano del instructor ha sido “accionista, secretario, e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical”, según ha informado el despacho de abogados a través de un comunicado.

Se trata de la mercantil propiedad del principal imputado, Ricardo Miranda, acusado de haberse apoderado de más de 12 millones de euros pagados por los estafados en concepto de depósitos para sus futuras viviendas. Las promociones, que iban a estar ubicadas en una parcela de Estepona y República Dominicana, nunca se llevaron a cabo.

Ignacio Coronado Ruz ha sido también representante de la mercantil Inversiones CCF -antiguo cotitular de unos terrenos propiedad de sociedades de Miranda en República Dominicana-, según el comunicado.

La sociedad CCF S.A., a la que ha estado vinculado el hermano del juez instructor, era copropietaria de los terrenos dominicanos junto a CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios cuyos dueños son los empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor, ambos procesados en el caso Malaya, en el que se enfrentan a abultadas penas de cárcel por diversos delitos, principalmente cohecho.

El bufete Lawbird ha solicitado no sólo la recusación del juez Coronado, sino también la ampliación de la querella inicial. Pretenden que también sean imputados junto a Miranda los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor, además del hermano del magistrado de Plaza Castilla.

“Todos ellos, incluido Ignacio Coronado, cobraron de las empresas de Miranda por la venta de sus acciones y transmisión de los terrenos de República Dominicana”. La ampliación de la querella recoge que el hermano del titular del Juzgado de Instrucción 16 de Madrid habría cobrado 100.000 euros a título personal.

En opinión de los letrados querellantes “es impensable entender que el juez instructor no supiera la vinculación de su hermano con los hechos denunciados que comenzó a investigar”. Así pues, afirman que Coronado “ha estado instruyendo casi dos años como si lo ignorara”.

In the Media , , , ,

British couple finally receive the Spanish home they won six years ago

July 21st, 2012

raffle-homeA Malaga court ruled that Arenal 2000 must give Suzan and Malcolm Windle, 68, a free home.

The case dates back to 2006 when the couple were ‘over the moon’ to be told they had won a ‘buy-one-get-one-free’ competition for a new apartment worth €250,000 in Benalmadena.

The couple from Yorkshire entered the competition with agent Andalucia Dream Homes when they bought their current home in Isla Redonda, near Sevilla.

But the dream soon turned into a nightmare.

“It is like being told you have won the lottery and then you haven’t,” explained Suzan, 54, whose picture was even used by the company for marketing their win on billboards along the N340.

“We were over the moon when we won; and planned to rent it and use it as a holiday home,” she told the Olive Press.

“But it has dragged on for six years and we never got a house.”

During this time the two companies involved, Andalucia Dream Homes, which is now in liquidation, and Arenal 2000, owned by disgraced  businessman Rafael Gomez Sandokan, both blamed each other.

“It has been six years of hell and stress as we have been passed from pillar to post,” added Suzan, who praised the work of her lawyer Roberto Leiro from Lawbird.

“It is finally excellent news. As Arenal no longer owns the apartment we are either going to get another apartment or financial compensation.

“We are just keeping our fingers crossed it is coming to an end.”

In the Media ,

Condenan a Arenal 2000 a entregar una vivienda sorteada antes de estallar Malaya

July 20th, 2012

Documents

 

In the Media

Condenan a ‘Sandokán’ a entregar una vivienda a los ganadores de un sorteo

July 20th, 2012
Condenan a 'Sandokán' a entregar una vivienda a los ganadores de un sorteo

Los ganadores de la vivienda en el momento en el que recibieron las llaves del apartamento de forma simbólica en 2006. :: Sur
Una pareja de británicos que ganó una vivienda en un sorteo realizado en 2006 ha logrado que una juez reconozca su derecho a disfrutar de una casa que nunca llegó a entregarse. La titular del Juzgado de lo Mercantil Número 2 de Málaga ha condenado a la empresa Arenal 2000 S.L., propiedad del empresario cordobés Rafael Gómez Sánchez (Sandokán), y a Dream Homes World Wide S.L. a que entreguen a los afectados la vivienda tal y como se establecía en las bases de la rifa, que se realizó ante un notario de Marbella.
Los hechos ocurrieron en 2006, cuando Suzan Windle y su pareja resultaron ganadores en un sorteo de la agencia inmobiliaria Andalucian Dream Homes S.L., que posteriormente pasó a denominarse Dream Homes World Wide S.L. y que se encargaba de comercializar la promoción de Benalmádena Arenal Golf; enclave en el que se encuentra situado el apartamento que se reclama, explicaron desde el despacho de abogados Lawbird, que representa a Windle.
El sorteo tuvo lugar el 28 de abril de 2006 ante notario y, en los días posteriores, se realizó en el piso piloto de la urbanización la entrega simbólica de las llaves del apartamento, que está valorado en 248.000 euros. Según indicaron desde el despacho, los ganadores de la rifa se encontraban «felices» y participaron en un acto que contó con una «espectacular puesta en escena».
Una vez construida la promoción y obtenida la licencia de primera ocupación, el acuerdo entre ambas mercantiles preveía que la promotora haría entrega de la vivienda a los ganadores, según indicaron las citadas fuentes, quienes precisaron que el acuerdo también recogía que Arenal recibiría de la agencia inmobiliaria la mitad del valor de la propiedad, una vez realizado el sorteo.
‘Operación Malaya’
El retraso en la entrega de la vivienda a los ganadores se atribuyó a la falta de licencia de primera ocupación inicialmente. Desde el despacho Lawbird aseguraron que, poco tiempo después, «se supo la verdadera razón por la que no se cumplía con la prometida entrega del apartamento: la empresa propietaria del mismo, Arenal Sur 21 S.A., a la sazón empresa del Grupo Arenal 2000, fue adquirida por Cajasur a través de su participada Prienesur, al poco tiempo de estallar la ‘Operación Malaya’, y, con ella, la promoción donde estaba la vivienda en cuestión». Al respecto, añadieron que la entidad bancaria negó que el sorteo le vinculara.
Ahora, el Juzgado de lo Mercantil Número 2 de Málaga obliga a Arenal 2000 y Dream Homes World Wide a cumplir con el compromiso asumido, entregando la vivienda a los ganadores del sorteo y condenando a ambas a pagar las costas del juicio, según estipula la sentencia. Finalmente, desde el despacho manifestaron que, al estar la vivienda ya vendida a una tercera persona, se solicitará el abono del importe de la misma.

In the Media