Tag Archives: Antonio Flores

May 18th, 2013
Story by Colin Freeman | The Telegraph

Once a land of Ferraris, cocaine and women, it was the flashy destination of choice for the most notorious fugitives of Britain’s underworld. Now, as the arrest of Andrew Moran shows, Spain’s “Costa del Crime” is the worst place to go on the run, reports Colin Freeman.

Since he last gained fame as a brief item in the “Crimewatch” slot of his local television news, a lot has changed for Manchester armed robber Jason Coghlan.

Having broken out of the dock during a court appearance in 1999, he spent a fortnight as one of the North West’s most wanted men before being re-arrested and sentenced to 12 years in Britain’s highest security jails.

Today, though, the man the police warned the public not to approach comes across as very approachable, having turned his back on crime in favour of a new venture in sunny Marbella.

This time he is on the right side of the law – just – acting as a legal “Mr Fixit” to the British criminal fraternity, who complain that a decent Spanish lawyer is as hard to find as a decent Spanish plumber.

“A lot of lawyers out here aren’t good at acting for foreign criminals, and when Brits get arrested they need someone like me to guide them to a decent one,” said Mr Coghlan, 43, whose younger brother, Arran, is nicknamed the “Teflon Don” back in Manchester after three separate attempts to prosecute him for different murders failed.

 

Jason Coghlan

“I make sure they’re represented properly and handle the translation issues, but I can also talk the criminal’s language, as it were, because of my background,” Mr Coghlan added.

One potential client for Mr Coghlan now is fellow Mancunian Andrew Moran, 31, who last week became the star of his very own mini-gangster movie when Spanish police released a video of his arrest at the poolside of his villa in Calpe, near Benidorm.

The footage, which received widespread media coverage, showed police creeping up on Mr Moran as he sunbathed, pouncing on him as he vaulted over a garden wall to escape. That it looked like a scene from the Costa-based crime flick Sexy Beast, in which Ray Winstone’s retired villain whiles away life by the pool, was no coincidence. Spanish police, who allegedly discovered two pistols at Moran’s villa, knew that if they grabbed him in his trunks, he was unlikely to be armed.

In the back yard of Moran’s empty villa this weekend, a bottle of Factor 20 suncream was the only remaining sign of his life in the run, which began four years ago with a previous vault from the dock of Burnley Crown Court, when he was on trial for a mail van hold-up. Spanish judges are now debating whether to extradite him to Britain, or try him in Spain, where he faces separate charges of cannabis dealing and ramming two police cars while evading a previous arrest attempt last year.

Yet while Moran’s arrest was hailed as a triumph by British police, who nowadays work much more closely with their Spanish counterparts, it also showed that the “Costa del Crime” is still popular with Britons facing accusations of villainy.

Moran was on a list of no less than 65 “most wanted” issued in the past six years by Operation Captura, the Spanish arm of Britain’s Crimestoppers scheme, which targets suspects thought to be hiding in Spain by distributing leaflets and beer mats with hotline numbers to expat bars. Of that 65, all but 15 have now been arrested. And at the risk of doing himself out of future clients, Mr Coghlan says that other fugitives planning on coming here should think again.

“Quote me on this – Spain is singularly the worst place to go on the run,” he said.

Police capture Andrew Moran in Calpe.

“In the 1970s it was okay because there was no extradition treaty. But nowadays there is lots of police attention, both British and Spanish. You might as well hide in Norfolk. Spain is not an imaginative choice at all, but then again, many villains do not have much imagination.”

It is a far cry from the old days, which Mr Coghlan himself caught the tail end of in the 1990s, when he would regularly head out to Marbella to spend the proceeds of his crimes, blowing tens of thousands of pounds in just a few weeks.

“Back then I felt like a king, and it felt safe to spend money there,” he said. “There was a place where you could hire Ferraris for £600 a day, and the women were experts at parting you from your cash. I loved the birds, and I’d buy them whatever it took – jewellery, clothes whatever – just so we’d look good when out at night.

“But the Spanish police back then were a different breed, and you could still offer them money to get out of serious situations. Act all flash these days, and you’ll soon get into trouble.”

Certainly, Mr Moran appears to have kept a low profile, having had a distinctive mole removed via plastic surgery and swapping his skinhead look for a short-back-and sides and wispy moustache. He also seems to have avoided the expat bars in Calpe’s “English Square” where, apart from a local character named “Pikey Pete”, no-one remembers seeing any villainous types for years.

“Nowadays, those kind of people stay in villas out in the countryside and keep themselves to themselves,” said one drinker, who nonetheless asked not to named.

Making life harder these days is increased airport security, the introduction of the pan-European arrest warrant in 2004, and occasional swoops by Spanish police, who will sometimes do random ID checks in bars frequented by British villains.

Yet many fugitives do still take their chances here, as is evident from a flick through the outstanding Captura wanted list, where the mugshots of Glasgow hardmen, Geordie gangsters and East End enforcers show the modern British underworld at all levels.

At the upper end are current fugitives like David Andrews, 66, accused of running a major cocaine trafficking gang, and Derek “Decco” Ferguson, wanted over a Strathclyde pub carpark shooting in 2007. Further down, meanwhile, are men like alleged heroin dealer Scott Coleman, who, with a distinctive pair of lips tattooed on his buttocks, has presumably had to be more cautious with the ladies than Mr Coghlan was.

So why do they still come? “It’s partly because there is a well established British community there that they can assimilate into very easily,” said Dave Allen, head of the fugitives unit at the Serious and Organised Crime Agency.

“Parts of Spain are basically like south London with sunshine. Having said that, we’ve changed our policing methods a lot in the last 30 years, and nowadays, criminals who move abroad are never off our radar.”

The other attraction is Spain’s prime location in the drug trade, which is now booming more than ever. Cocaine and marijuana is easily trafficked in from North Africa, from where it can then be sold retail on the Costa club scene, or shipped wholesale to Britain. According to some estimates, as many as 30 or 40 British criminal gangs now operate in southern Spain, alongside Dutch, Eastern European and Irish gangs, the latter fleeing recent crackdowns in their Dublin strongholds.

True, increased transport hub security in the post 9/11 era makes airports and ports harder for fugitives. But many use so-called “FOG” passports – or “fraudulently obtained genuine” passports – whereby a criminal will bribe someone for their personal documents and then use them to obtain a legally valid passport.

Once out in Spain, criminals can also usually rely on networks of contacts to help them, said Mr Allen – assuming they are not “too hot to handle”.

But while a large criminal fraternity can help provide a support network, it can also be a problem. Fellow villains are far more likely to recognise fugitives – and give their game away – than ordinary members of the public are.

“The police always call it ‘intelligence’ to make themselves sound intelligent, but when they arrest someone it’s usually just some other villain has informed on them,” said Mr Coghlan.

Which is where his new Marbella-based firm, Jacog Law, comes in.

Specialising in “Spanish to English Criminal Legal Services”, it has gained 28 clients since starting 16 months ago, including a Briton accused of smuggling a tonne of hashish, and a suspected IRA hitman convicted of murdering Daniel Smith, himself a suspected gangster, in a bar near Marbella in 2010. And while Mr Coghlan does not claim to be a lawyer, he does bring considerable practical experience of criminal legal systems, both in Britain and in Spain.

Originally from Stockport, he fell into crime when he was young, being booted out of the Commandos for assault and theft and then becoming involved in car-ringing and robbery. His brother Arran, meanwhile, has been accused three times of the murders of northern gangland figures and also arrested over a large-scale cocaine smuggling plot. He has never been convicted of any of the offences, however, and insists he is a legitimate businessman facing a police vendetta.

After his initial arrest for the 1999 post office robbery, Jason Coghlan escaped from Trafford Magistrates Court, where, having told guards he needed crutches for a leg injury, he threw the crutches away and leaped over the dock. He was then caught in Blackpool a fortnight later, and having been classified as a Category Double AA high-risk prisoner, served his time in maximum security jails like Whitemoor, where he met Britain’s topmost gangsters. Among them was the Brinks Mat bullion handler and road rage killer Kenneth Noye, who himself was arrested in Spain in 1998 after two years on the run.

“I did ask him once why he’d gone to the south of Spain,” said Mr Coghlan. “He said that for people of his generation, it was the only place they really knew.”

Having decided to reform, Mr Coghlan become a jail-house lawyer while inside, advising other prisoners on legal cases and appeals. He got the idea for his current venture, though, after subsequently being thrown in jail in Spain, where he went after his release in Britain to pursue an alleged time-share fraudster who owed his mother money. The man complained to the police, who then arrested Mr Coghlan and held him on remand for 11 months. Worse still, he claims, a lawyer he paid €10,000 to only visited him once.

“It is hard to describe how bad the legal service is out here,” he said.

“While I was in prison I also heard dozens of other complaints about the inefficiencies of lawyers out here, and having learned the hard way, I now want to change that.”

To that end, his firm refers work to a number of favoured legal firms, in return for a percentage of any fees they then charge. Unlike some Spanish legal firms, he says, they will challenge weak police cases rather than simply plea bargaining.

“It is fair to say that a lot of Spanish lawyers take a rather laid back approach,” agreed Antonio Flores, a leading lawyer at Lawbird Legal Services in Marbella, which has had referrals from Mr Coghlan.

True, Mr Coghlan freely admits that his own reputation helps to ensure that nobody trifles with his clients. But he adds: “There is nothing legally wrong with what we do, even if the authorities don’t like it. And I’m not pretending to be a lawyer, I’m just a good case administrator.”

Ironically for a man who now claims to have gone straight, the success of his future venture will, of course, depend on the Costa del Crime continuing to attract villains. As things stand, though, that seems likely – even if they do look over their shoulder rather more often while sitting by the pool.

April 18th, 2013
Story by Debbie Barlett | Sur in English

2013-04-Lawbird-Sur-in-English-Property-and-Finance-Done-RightThere is general agreement that this is a good time to buy property in Spain. Prices are unlikely to drop further and those who are looking to buy as an investment should receive a good return when they sell in the medium to long term. Those looking for a main residence or holiday home will also be able to afford a larger or more luxurious property than they might otherwise have done.

Whatever the reason for the purchase, buying a property is a major investment and one that needs to be protected and looked after. The number one rule in this regard is to use the services of a lawyer. It might be tempting to save money by not doing so if everything appears to be straightforward, but this could well prove to be a false economy.

Why is a lawyer essential? For many reasons, says Antonio Flores, of Lawbird Legal Services in Marbella. Horror stories can happen.

[..]

Download the PDF for further reading:

March 22nd, 2013
Sur in English

Lawbird-Spanish-tax-office-will-not-accept-Equity-Release

 

A Marbella law firm has denounced around ten banks for fraud

Spanish “Hacienda” has recently confirmed that the so-called Equity release on Spanish property is not valid for tax mitigation purposes. According to an official answer to an enquiry submitted by Lawbird Legal Services representing 100 of approximately 1,000 victims, mostly British, attempting to mitigate wealth and inheritance taxes registering a charge against the property is tax fraud.  

This matter was denounced a year ago at the Audiencia Nacional as fraud, fraudulent publicity and tax evasion but the Magistrate Fernando Andreu dismissed the case on grounds that he deemed the allegations to not be of a serious nature and the facts were not proven conclusively. Civil proceedings have been filed and rulings are soon expected.  

According to Antonio Flores of Lawbird, “the Tax Office’s response represents a boost to the aspirations of the victims in relation to demonstrating that, indeed, they were victims of a scam and not accomplices to an alleged fraud, as has been insinuated”.  

Following the dismissal of the case by the National Audience back in April 2012 and further to a “denuncia” filed at the Malaga offices of the Spanish Tax Office, Lawbird indicated that it was this body who should investigate if such a “tax amnesty”, now deemed fraud, did actually exist.  

Tax fraud

Hacienda has now come back stating that the approximately 600 mortgage loans sold to foreign pensioners with a Spanish property, under the pretext that they would allow them to – legally- mitigate wealth tax during the life of the subscriber, and inheritance taxes following their demise, cannot benefit from any reduction in such taxes. In fact, the Tax Office states that attempting to reduce the value of the home would constitute tax fraud and a criminal offence where the defrauded sum exceeds €120,000 per tax year.  

Lawbird deems that “the borrowers are victims because top banks confirmed the legality of the product, assisted by top-notch Madrid lawyers who now, following the repercussions of the case, are distancing themselves from their former clients.”  

Banks

The banks allegedly involved are Nordea Bank Luxemburg, Danske Bank Luxemburg, Landsbanki, Jyske Bank,Rothschild, Sydbank and Nykredit who sold either directly, or through unregulated Costa financial offices, the financial packages. Most of the pseudo-IFAs have now disappeared.  

According to the victims, the strategy was to scare them with unbearable tax consequences should they not do anything with their unencumbered properties. Several banks, most of them from Scandinavian countries with private banking offices in Luxembourg, made their clients believe that that in Spain, if someone is to die without having a mortgage on their properties, the Tax Office would tax the inheritors so heavily that they would not be able to ever pay those taxes.  

They offered mortgage loans to reduce the value of their properties and advised that the loan capital should be sent to opaque tax havens, in some cases, with a view to have it invested on behalf of the pensioner. However, as a result of poor investment decisions by these banks the invested capital lost substantially and now, the victims are fighting to save their homes.  

This alleged financial plot started in 2004 and finished in 2008. Flores calculated that in Spain, over 500 couples could be affected, most of them pensioners. The total sum of funds taken out to Luxembourg could reach 250 million euros, according to the lawyer. The banks told their clients that this sum would be “tax free” if it was inherited in a tax haven, or without the Spanish Hacienda’s knowledge. The alleged fraud to the Tax Office could reach, on average, 20 per cent of the total sums, approximately 50 million euros in total.  

Lawbird is particularly worried that pensioners with very limited income, some of whom were over 85 years of age, decided to rush into speculative investments with their properties.

Spanish tax office will not accept equity release to mitigate taxes

 

January 17th, 2013
Story by Europa Press | La Vanguardia

Más de un centenar de afectados por una macroestafa inmobiliaria en la Costa del Sol, en su mayoría de nacionalidad británica y norteamericana, han recusado al titular del Juzgado de Instrucción Número 16 de Madrid, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, tras detectar que su hermano, Ignacio Coronado Ruz, “aparece vinculado societariamente al principal implicado en el fraude, Ricardo Miranda Miret”.

El despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en la localidad malagueña de Marbella y representante de los afectados por dicha estafa, se ha hecho cargo de la presentación de la correspondiente recusación.

En el escrito dirigido al juez Coronado Ruz para que abandone el caso, los abogados Antonio Flores Vila y Luis Fernando González Ordóñez han hecho constar que el hermano del instructor ha sido “accionista, secretario, e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical SA”, según ha informado el despacho de abogados a través de un comunicado.

Se trata de la mercantil propiedad del principal imputado, Ricardo Miranda, acusado de haberse apoderado de más de 12 millones de euros pagados por los estafados en concepto de depósitos para sus futuras viviendas. Las promociones, que iban a estar ubicadas en una parcela de Estepona y República Dominicana, nunca se llevaron a cabo.

Así, Ignacio Coronado Ruz ha sido también representante de la mercantil Inversiones CCF S.A. –antiguo cotitular de unos terrenos propiedad de sociedades de Miranda en República Dominicana–, según el comunicado.

Tal y como ya se conoció públicamente al presentarse la querella por esta estafa inmobiliaria, en febrero de 2011, no sólo hay afectados por el fraude en Estepona, sino también en el citado país caribeño, según el citado comunicado.

La sociedad CCF S.A., a la que ha estado vinculado el hermano del juez instructor, era copropietaria de los terrenos dominicanos junto a CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios S.A. cuyos dueños son los conocidos empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor.

Según ha informado el despacho de abogados Lawbird, ambos han sido juzgados recientemente en el juicio oral por el Caso ‘Malaya’ y se enfrentan a abultadas penas de cárcel por diversos delitos, principalmente cohecho.

Así, el bufete Lawbird ha solicitado no sólo la recusación del juez Coronado, sino también la ampliación de la querella inicial. Pretenden que también sean imputados junto a Miranda los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor, además del hermano del magistrado de Plaza Castilla.

“Todos ellos, incluido Ignacio Coronado, cobraron de las empresas de Miranda por la venta de sus acciones y transmisión de los terrenos de República Dominicana”, ha expresado el comunicado. En concreto, la ampliación de la querella recoge que el hermano del titular del Juzgado de Instrucción 16 de Madrid habría cobrado 100.000 euros a título personal, aproximadamente.

En opinión de los letrados querellantes “es impensable entender que el juez instructor no supiera la vinculación de su hermano con los hechos denunciados que comenzó a investigar”. Así pues, afirman que Coronado “ha estado instruyendo casi dos años como si lo ignorara”.

También, lamentan que el juez ahora recusado no haya tomado medida cautelar alguna, desde que comenzó a instruir dicha querella, y no descartan “acciones judiciales directas” derivadas de los hechos de la recusación, “teniendo en cuenta en todo este caso la mejor atención a nuestros clientes que depositaron su confianza en la justicia penal española, y a fin de evitar que situaciones como la presente vuelvan a plantearse a nadie que acuda a pedir justicia en España”.

Los damnificados, en su mayoría de nacionalidad británica, pero también irlandeses y norteamericanos, habían elegido Estepona como un lugar seguro para sus inversiones y también como segunda residencia.

Cabe recordar que la inmobiliaria Ocean View y Sun Golf Desarrollos Inmobiliarios, cuyo dueño es Ricardo Miranda, promocionaron y vendieron a gran parte de los querellantes viviendas en Estepona en la promoción denominada Estepona & Country Club. Se iba a construir en el paraje de Arroyo Vaquero.

Además, Lawbird ha expresado que la promotora jamás ha sido propietaria del citado terreno y el suelo no es apto siquiera para edificar, nunca lo fue. Nunca fue solicitada la licencia de obra para construir, ante el Ayuntamiento de Estepona (Málaga). A lo máximo que llegó el promotor fue a pedir un permiso para la caseta de ventas que, incluso, fue denegado por el Consistorio malagueño.

Por último, Lawbird ha denunciado que “tanto Ocean View como la promotora y Ricardo Miranda sabían todo lo anterior y, sin embargo se enriquecieron con las ventas sobre plano”, desviando los depósitos a sus empresas en República Dominicana para financiar la compra de terrenos, y así continuar allí el irregular negocio inmobiliario objeto también de la querella. Los letrados Flores y González Ordóñez destacan que “para evitar el alcance de semejante engaño, la promotora nunca firmó los contratos que sí firmaron los compradores”.

Also in:

 

January 17th, 2013
Malaga Hoy

Más de un centenar de afectados por una estafa inmobiliaria en la Costa del Sol, la mayoría de nacionalidad británica y norteamericana, han recusado al titular del Juzgado de Instrucción Número 16 de Madrid, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, tras detectar que su hermano, Ignacio Coronado Ruz, “aparece vinculado societariamente al principal implicado en el fraude, Ricardo Miranda Miret”.

El despacho de abogados Lawbird, con sede en Marbella y representante de los afectados, se ha hecho cargo de presentar la correspondiente recusación.

En el escrito dirigido al juez Coronado Ruz para que abandone el caso, los abogados Antonio Flores Vila y Luis Fernando González Ordóñez han hecho constar que el hermano del instructor ha sido “accionista, secretario, e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical”, según ha informado el despacho de abogados a través de un comunicado.

Se trata de la mercantil propiedad del principal imputado, Ricardo Miranda, acusado de haberse apoderado de más de 12 millones de euros pagados por los estafados en concepto de depósitos para sus futuras viviendas. Las promociones, que iban a estar ubicadas en una parcela de Estepona y República Dominicana, nunca se llevaron a cabo.

Ignacio Coronado Ruz ha sido también representante de la mercantil Inversiones CCF -antiguo cotitular de unos terrenos propiedad de sociedades de Miranda en República Dominicana-, según el comunicado.

La sociedad CCF S.A., a la que ha estado vinculado el hermano del juez instructor, era copropietaria de los terrenos dominicanos junto a CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios cuyos dueños son los empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor, ambos procesados en el caso Malaya, en el que se enfrentan a abultadas penas de cárcel por diversos delitos, principalmente cohecho.

El bufete Lawbird ha solicitado no sólo la recusación del juez Coronado, sino también la ampliación de la querella inicial. Pretenden que también sean imputados junto a Miranda los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor, además del hermano del magistrado de Plaza Castilla.

“Todos ellos, incluido Ignacio Coronado, cobraron de las empresas de Miranda por la venta de sus acciones y transmisión de los terrenos de República Dominicana”. La ampliación de la querella recoge que el hermano del titular del Juzgado de Instrucción 16 de Madrid habría cobrado 100.000 euros a título personal.

En opinión de los letrados querellantes “es impensable entender que el juez instructor no supiera la vinculación de su hermano con los hechos denunciados que comenzó a investigar”. Así pues, afirman que Coronado “ha estado instruyendo casi dos años como si lo ignorara”.

January 17th, 2013
Story by JUANA VIÚDEZ | El Pais

Un centenar de afectados por una supuesta estafa inmobiliaria cometida en la Costa del Sol, República Dominicana y Marruecos ha recusado al instructor de la causa, José Emilio Coronado Ruz, titular del juzgado de instrucción número 16 de Madrid, porque su hermano Ignacio Coronado Ruz, está vinculado societariamente al principal implicado en el supuesto fraude, Ricardo Miranda Miret.

La querella por la estafa, que alcanza los 4 millones de euros, lleva casi dos años en instrucción. Sin embargo, los perjudicados han descubierto justo ahora el parentesco. Según el escrito de los abogados Antonio Flores y Luis Fernando González, el hermano del instructor ha sido “accionista, secretario e incluso presidente del consejo de administración de la sociedad Paraíso Tropical SA”, también propiedad del principal imputado.

El bufete encargado del caso también ha solicitado una ampliación de la querella inicial con la que pretenden que se impute al hermano del magistrado y a los empresarios Carlos Sánchez Hernández y Andrés Liétor. Estos dos últimos han sido procesados y están pendientes de sentencia por el caso Malaya contra la corrupción en el Ayuntamiento marbellí.

Según los abogados, el hermano del magistrado ha sido también representante de la sociedad CCF S. A., dueña de unos terrenos en República Dominicana. Estas mismas parcelas también pertenecen a la sociedad CCF 21 Negocios Inmobiliarios S. A., cuyos dueños son los empresarios Sánchez y Liétor.

Los afectados por la supuesta estafa, en su mayoría británicos, lamentan que el juez no haya tomado medida cautelar alguna desde que comenzó a instruir la querella y no descartan “acciones judiciales directas”.

La defensa del promotor Ricardo Miranda sostiene que en este tiempo se ha demostrado que su defendido devolvió “todo el dinero que le reclaman”. “Se ha acreditado con transferencias bancarias”, añade el abogado Alberto Fraguas.

Los perjudicados llegaron a pagar 4,2 millones por unas viviendas que no se construyeron

Los querellantes acusan a Miranda y a la comercializadora Ocean View Properties, en proceso de liquidación, de cobrar sumas millonarias por tres promociones que nunca llegaron a construirse. Según sus testimonios, 43 de ellos llegaron a pagar 4,2 millones de euros por unos apartamentos en Estepona para los que, según la querella, el promotor no tenía ni la propiedad del terreno, ni llegó a solicitar licencia de obra. La entrega media oscilaba entre los 70.0000 y 100.000 euros, aunque algunos aportaron hasta un millón de euros por varias propiedades.

Según la querella, la inmobiliaria Ocean View Properties se encargaba de comercializar las promociones y les daba a firmar un contrato tipo, en el que nunca aparecía la firma del promotor. Las promociones se llamaban Estepona Beach&Country Club, Punta Perla Marina (Republica Dominicana) y Tafedna Bay (Marruecos). Los afectados acusan al empresario de desviar el dinero que le entregaron por la promoción de Málaga a sociedades de República Dominicana.

Miranda mantiene que la inmobiliaria Ocean View Properties le encargó que construyera la urbanización de Estepona y que le adelantaron por este trabajo 12 millones. El proyecto “no fue viable por problemas administrativos”, entonces, según su testimonio, devolvió a la inmobiliaria los 12 millones con una serie de transferencias que asegura haber acreditado.

January 10th, 2013
Story by José Carlos Villanueva | El Mundo

La titular del Juzgado de Instrucción 4 de Marbella, Beatriz Fernández Gómez-Escolar, ha archivado la querella por presunto delito de estafa contra el conocido empresario inmobiliario Darragh MacAnthony,propietario de la desaparecida empresa de compra-venta de inmuebles que lleva su apellido.

Según ha informado el despacho de abogados marbellí Lawbird, representante de un colectivo de afectados por las prácticas de MacAnthony, la magistrada ha alegado “en contra del criterio de la Audiencia Nacional” que dichos perjudicados “son extranjeros” y, por lo tanto, los tribunales españoles “carecen de jurisdicción” sobre los hechos denunciados.

En su auto, la juez estima que “nos encontramos ante delitos que se han consumado en el extranjero habida cuenta de haberse producido los desplazamientos patrimoniales desde las cuentas que los perjudicados tenían en el extranjero, así como por ser extranjeros los presuntos estafadores”.

En opinión de Lawbird, la instructora ha “obviado” el hecho de que tanto la sede del grupo empresarial como sus responsables tenían el domicilio en Marbella. Todas las transferencias se recibían en una cuenta de una sucursal de Solbank en esta misma ciudad, y es aquí donde el montante de los presuntamente estafado habría desaparecido.

Los afectados por la presunta estafa, todos británicos e irlandeses,entregaron entre 10.000 y 15.000 euros para unos muebles que pensaban instalar en las viviendas que la inmobiliaria comercializaba en países como Turquía, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde o Italia. Firmaron sus contratos entre 2005 y 2010, año en el que la empresa cerró su sede en Marbella.

El número de personas afectadas por los incumplimientos contractuales de MacAnthony a nivel global se cuentan por miles. Son varias las asociaciones de afectados que han iniciado acciones legales contra MacAnthony y sus empresas, siendo MRI-SG (Misled Realty Investors Support Group), con 1.400 miembros, la más activa. Darragh MacAnthoty es actualmente un personaje público en el Reino Unido, al serpropietario de un club de fútbol de la Primera División Inglesa, el Peterborough United.

El abogado Antonio Flores, máximo responsable del citado bufete, ha recordado en un comunicado que la juez Fernández investigaba hasta ahora el paradero de 500.000 euros abonado por sus representados a la inmobiliaria denunciada “para la compra de unos inmuebles que nunca recibieron”. La decisión judicial se produce tras más de un año de instrucción y “a pesar de haber tomado declaración a todos los imputados”. Además, la magistrada ordenó también hace un año que todos los querellantes ratificaran en persona su denuncia, como así fue.

Paralelamente, el también letrado Luis González Ordóñez, integrante del despacho Lawbird y quien lleva las riendas del caso, al representar a la mayoría de los querellantes, no ha ocultado su “asombro”, tras conocer el archivo de las actuaciones. No obstante, el penalista ya ha anunciado que recurrirán el auto, al no ser firme. Primero en reforma, ante el propio Juzgado y luego ante la Audiencia Provincial de Málaga, en apelación.

“Es sorprendente y difícil de explicar que un juez archive este caso de estafa por ser extranjeros los estafadores denunciados y alegando que los hechos se habrían cometido en el extranjero”, explicó González Ordóñez.

Entre los querellados figura un británico que reside desde su infancia en Marbella, y “el testaferro español de 90 años que se encuentra al frente como administrador del grupo empresarial MacAnthony, cuya sede en el momento de los hechos era precisamente el Club Financiero Inmobiliario”, reza el comunicado remitido.

El nonagenario testaferro había declarado que cobraba un sueldo únicamente por figurar como administrador de la sociedad, si bien confirmó que no sabía absolutamente nada de los manejos que se realizaban con las cuentas bancarias ni el destino dado a los fondos.

April 25th, 2012
Story by ANDREW PENMAN | Mirror

Holiday property mogul Darragh MacAnthony appeared in a Spanish court yesterday to answer charges that he never delivered furniture packs worth £400,000 to 51 customers.

The 36-year-old Irish multi-millionaire and chairman of Peterborough United was summonsed by the Marbella criminal court after the customers filed a complaint against him and his company, MacAnthony Realty International.

Lawyer Antonio Flores said the company had acted “in a disgraceful manner”, adding: “They never filed for insolvency in Spain. They simply disappeared.”

Records show that the former holiday home giant moved its registered premises to a ghost office in Madrid where it was placed under the management of a non-trading Peruvian company run by a 90-year-old man.

MacAnthony denies the accusations and has blamed the credit crunch, which forced several of MRI’s furniture suppliers to fold, and has called the legal action as a “ridiculous suit”.

The Spanish judge will decide whether MacAnthony and the five other defendants should face the charges of “misappropriation of funds and theft by swindle”.

April 25th, 2012
Story by Wendy Williams | The Olive Press

Peterborough United boss faces fraud charges in Spain

The Irish football mogul was grilled by the judge in Marbella for two hours behind closed doors.

Arriving in a white Range Rover with two men, it is the first time the football boss has faced the music in Spain.

He was joined by his former chief executive Dominic Pickering, Sarah O’Callaghan, and Nicola Shaw, a former director of MRI Ireland.

Meanwhile, 90-year-old Fernando A., whose Peruvian company Inmobiliaria Vasco Peruana SAC took over MRI Overseas Property Group in 2010, also travelled over for the hearing.

None of the accused, who have continually denied the allegations, would speak with reporters.

“I’m sure you are a lovely lady but I am not speaking to you,” said MacAnthony.

It comes three months after over 40 victims travelled to Marbella to tell a judge how the football boss’ company MacAnthony Realty International (MRI) failed to deliver over half a million euros of furniture to them between 2005 and 2010.

MRI – which boasted an annual turnover of more than 100m euros before the crisis – developed resorts in several countries from its main base in Marbella, from where it sold the furniture packs.

The alleged victims – who filed a claim in Madrid in June last year – accuse MacAnthony, 35, of keeping 600,000 euros which they collectively paid for furniture packages for homes in Bulgaria, Turkey, and Morocco.

Meanwhile, Antonio Flores, the Spanish lawyer acting for the group, claims ‘many other’ customers are also affected and due to file further claims.

“The missing furniture is just one of the irregularities linked to the company,” he said.

Flores insisted an additional claim, totalling 15m euros, is being prepared on behalf of up to 200 British and Irish MRI customers claiming they lost large sums in upfront fees.

“Today was just the first step. The courts were gathering information and just listening to what everyone has to say before they decide how to proceed further,” said Flores.

“There is also another claim that will be made in the not too distant future that is substantial.”

April 13th, 2012
Story by M. ÁNGELES GONZÁLEZ | Sur in English

Jean Hilary Leftwich has not yet got used to the idea that other people are enjoying the house that she lived in for almost 25 years in Alhaurín de la Torre. This 67 year old British resident is one of more than 400 people affected in the province of Malaga by an alleged fraud committed by foreign banks. As a result she has been forced to rent out her home and sell an apartment in Marbella at a loss to pay off a debt that threatened to leave her homeless.

On Monday she joined another thirty or so foreigners resident on the Costa del Sol, most of themBritish, in a peaceful protest outside the Malaga tax office organised by the Equity Release Victims Association (ERVA).

The aim of the gathering was to deliver a writ to the Spanish tax authorities to formally denounce that at least ten banks, mainlyDanish, had turned them into accomplices in a tax fraud involving equity release and the investment of large sums of money in tax havens such as Luxembourg and the Channel Islands.

According to the victims, and to lawyer Antonio Flores who represents some members of the group, between 2004 and 2009 the banks they now accuse of fraud convinced them, through advertisements in the press, leaflets and phone calls, to take out a kind of reverse mortgage on their homes so that their heirs would not face paying inheritance tax that could amount to as much as 80 per cent of the value of property if this is free of all liens. They were also promised attractive returns through the investment of much of the loan in funds that were allegedly risk free. The offer was attractive to pensioners whose assets were all tied up in their property and who required cash to top up their income.

“I wanted some money to travel to England to visit my grandchildren”, explains Jean Hilary Leftwich, who ended up having to sell her apartment in Marbella to pay off her 385,000 euro debt with the bank. Sixty five year old Toni Minta fears losing his home in Estepona, for which he paid 600,000 euros ten years ago. He took out a loan for 1,250,000 euros which went to a tax haven. Now the ups and downs of the economy have reduced this sum to 500,000 euros yet his original debt with the bank remains intact.

ERVA Chairman Euan Armstrong describes the protest as a success.

“Now that we have informed the Spanish tax authority of the possible loss of revenue by the removal from Spain of all the money taken from our members which has been deposited in Luxembourg (a tax free state) in order to evade Inheritance Tax, then we would expect them to ask the guilty banks to declare how many clients have died since buying these investment plans therefore evading Inheritance Tax.

“We are confident of some sort of result after this. The Spanish Tax Authority cannot ignore this and neither can the banks involved in the scam”, he points out.

Earlier this year the ‘Audiencia Nacional’ court rejected the case.

Downloads